![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Navigation
RSS Feeds
For the latest info on computer hardware, tech, news, video games, software tips, and Linux, check out our new improved front page: HCW Tech Blog Newsletter Sign-up
FREE! Subscribe to the hardCOREware Newsletter!
|
Reviewed by: Carl Nelson [08.30.06]
Specifications
Although they look nearly identical, these two boards have a few major differences. First, take a glance at the specs of each:
First of all, notice that even the 945P board supports the Core 2 Extreme processor. However that might not be the best pairing, as the 945P does not allow core ratio adjustments. It's not like anyone is going to buy a $99 motherboard for their $1000 CPU though, right? Because the P965 uses the ICH8 southbridge, which has done away with IDE support, Gigabyte has added JMicron's JMB363 SATA/IDE controller. Thankfully, this controller does not require "F6 drivers" to install Windows, so you won't be forced to use a floppy drive to install Windows. This controller does have basic RAID functions (RAID0, 1, 0+1, JBOD), runs on the PCI-E bus, and supports SATA-300. Neither of the boards use the RAID version of their respective Southbridges. Another difference is in the audio outputs. Although both boards use the same Realtek ALC883 codec, only the P965 comes with full 7.1 channel output. The 945P only has stereo out. There is a bracket that adds the rest of the channels, but it is not included with the board. There are also no digital inputs or outputs on the 945P, and you guessed it; adding them is supported by the board, but optional. Also note that the 945P does not officially support a DDR2-800 memory multiplier. Gigabyte have sort of gotten around this by adding a 2.66x multiplier which gives DDR2-709 speed (when the FSB is set to normal) and 3.33x which gives DDR2-888. So you have the choice of either underclocking or overclocking your memory. It's not the most elegant solution, but hey, AMD does the same thing with their AM2 processors ;) Finally, the boards use different Gigabit ethernet adapters, but both of them are decent adapters, and are PCI-E based. Features
Like the onboard specifications, the boards have very similar BIOS features. Being based on different chipsets though, there are bound to be some differences:
Both boards offer quite a few options for the overclocking crowd, including full control over FSB from 100-600 MHz, DDR2 voltage up to 2.4V, and a plethora of memory multipliers on each board. My only wish is that they had added a 3.0 multiplier to the 945P board for true DDR2-800 support. The P965 currently allows for an unlocked CPU multiplier on Core 2 Duo, and Gigabyte's board offers that. Although unlike the Core 2 Extreme, you can only control the multiplier downwards; in the case of the E6700, you have access to 6-10x. For now, the 945P does not support this, but I can see Gigabyte adding it in a future BIOS revision if it's not limited by the chipset itself. Otherwise, BIOS features are quite similar, although the P965 only allows you to increase PCI-E voltage by 0.1V, and the 945P board does not have system temperature monitoring. We'll talk more about the BIOS later. For now, let's take a look at these boards! Next Page: (Board Layout Part 1)
|
Search hardCOREware.net
Most Popular Products
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Copyright © 1999 - 2008 hardCOREware | All rights reserved 1024x768 32 bit minimum | Our Privacy Statement | Web Hosting by NetNation |