![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Navigation
RSS Feeds
For the latest info on computer hardware, tech, news, video games, software tips, and Linux, check out our new improved front page: HCW Tech Blog Newsletter Sign-up
FREE! Subscribe to the hardCOREware Newsletter!
|
Reviewed by: Carl Nelson [10.31.04] Discuss this article in our forum!
SiSoft 2004 SP2b As usual, we'll start things off with some synthetic CPU benchmarks, to see where they sit in terms of processing power: Our Extreme Edition 3.46 is 2% faster than the 3.40, and that is exactly what the SiSoft results show. We didn't expect an increase here from FSB, and we didn't get any. PCMark 2004 Pro This is the first benchmark that could potentially show some interesting results. PCMark 2004 takes various components of what we would do in day-to-day computing, and turns out a neat, comparable score. In the "System" suite, these are the tests that take place: File compression Many of these tests are 'pure CPU' tests, but one would expect the increase bus rate to increase performance a bit more than clock speed. We also included the Memory test, and the 'pure CPU' test: We saw a 3% improvement on the CPU suite, which is a bit more than anticipated. The memory suite saw a 9% improvement, and the System suite was right in between the two, with a 4% increase. Now let's get to the gaming :) Next Page: (Gaming Benchmarks)
|
Search hardCOREware.net
Most Popular Products
|
||||
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Copyright © 1999 - 2008 hardCOREware | All rights reserved 1024x768 32 bit minimum | Our Privacy Statement | Web Hosting by NetNation |