![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Navigation
RSS Feed
For the latest info on computer hardware, tech, news, video games, software tips, and Linux, check out our new improved front page: HCW Tech Blog |
Reviewed by: Ed Lau [05.29.03] Manufactured by: Kingston Technology Discuss this article in the forum!
The Test Rig ...which consists of Processor: AMD Athlon 1700+ JIUHB My CPU regularly runs at 2.145GHz (195x11), which is a 679MHz overclock and I can hit over 2.2GHz so I don't forsee that my processor holding the memory back. Results Starting from the standard 166MHz FSB (333DDR), I slowly worked my way up. After experiencing a little instablity, lowering the CPU multiplier to 217x10 worked just fine, albeit a little hotter than usual. Further lowering the CPU multiplier to 9.5 gave me an astounding 224MHz FSB and an effective 448MHz memory speed. Anything further and it wasn't stable enough for Windows but it POSTed just fine. I tried at 456MHz and ended up with a corrupted hard drive. SiSoft Sandra PCMark 2002 - Memory
This is some absolutely kickass memory and it certainly lives up to it's billing and then some. Of course, overclocking takes a lot of patience in itself and you'll end up with needing some BIOS resets and a corrupt HD partition or two but in the end, the performance speaks for itself. Seriously, I only have one complaint about the kit and it's the same complaint I have with all high performance memory. It costs more than standard stuff. Last time I looked, the HyperX (along with comparable performance kits from Corsair, OCZ, etc) cost about $50 more than standard OEM brands like Samsung for an equivalent size and memory speed. However, you're paying for quality and the extra performance. And in my opinion, a lifetime waranty itself is worth more than $50.
Final Score: 94%
|
Search hardCOREware.net
Newsletter Sign-up
Most Popular Products
|
||||
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Copyright © 1999 - 2009 hardCOREware | All rights reserved |