<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video Card Naming Schemes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/</link>
	<description>The No. 1 PC &#38; Video Game Hardware Review Site in the world!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:56:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nvidia Release DX10 Goodness for the Masses &#187; HCW Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Nvidia Release DX10 Goodness for the Masses &#187; HCW Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>[...] version of the 8500GT, which may or may not have an effect or performance. (I&#8217;ve already ranted on video card naming schemes so I&#8217;ll resist repeating [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] version of the 8500GT, which may or may not have an effect or performance. (I&#8217;ve already ranted on video card naming schemes so I&#8217;ll resist repeating [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rutledge</title>
		<link>http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Rutledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Furthermore, they neglected to consider the X1950XTX.

Then it all makes sense:

X1950   XTX
X1900   XTX

X1950   XT
X1900   XT

X1950   PRO (OR GT as some manufacturers name)
X1900   GT  (OR PRO as some manufacturers name)


Clear enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Furthermore, they neglected to consider the X1950XTX.</p>
<p>Then it all makes sense:</p>
<p>X1950   XTX<br />
X1900   XTX</p>
<p>X1950   XT<br />
X1900   XT</p>
<p>X1950   PRO (OR GT as some manufacturers name)<br />
X1900   GT  (OR PRO as some manufacturers name)</p>
<p>Clear enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaneduce</title>
		<link>http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>shaneduce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m tired of spending as long as a week looking into video card spect&#039;s trying to fing the best for the $. 99% of my friends think the name is tell&#039;s you all you need to know. When realy Clock speed &amp; amount/speed of memory is what realy counts not the name.

p.s. oh yea the benchmark of the video card and your favort game should count too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m tired of spending as long as a week looking into video card spect&#8217;s trying to fing the best for the $. 99% of my friends think the name is tell&#8217;s you all you need to know. When realy Clock speed &amp; amount/speed of memory is what realy counts not the name.</p>
<p>p.s. oh yea the benchmark of the video card and your favort game should count too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voltus</title>
		<link>http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Voltus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I cant wait for the super-Extreme xxx edition Ice- cool water cooled super fast Xxxx19050000xtxxx super speed Fatality special limited print edition to hit the shelves!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant wait for the super-Extreme xxx edition Ice- cool water cooled super fast Xxxx19050000xtxxx super speed Fatality special limited print edition to hit the shelves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jin choung</title>
		<link>http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>jin choung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU!!!  yeah, wtf is up with these crazy ass naming schemes?!  why do we even need 4 fing digits?!  aaaaaah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU!!!  yeah, wtf is up with these crazy ass naming schemes?!  why do we even need 4 fing digits?!  aaaaaah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb</title>
		<link>http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>&quot;wouldn’t it be nice if at the very least video card manufacturers adopted a performance based naming scheme like the one CPU manufacturers used?&quot;

Ha, CPU manufacturers don&#039;t follow a standard either, try comparing an AMD to an Intel based only on the name...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;wouldn’t it be nice if at the very least video card manufacturers adopted a performance based naming scheme like the one CPU manufacturers used?&#8221;</p>
<p>Ha, CPU manufacturers don&#8217;t follow a standard either, try comparing an AMD to an Intel based only on the name&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>personally I like the idea of going the way of cpu branding because at least with cpus you know what you&#039;re getting - graphics cards are becoming rediculous (or rather, have been for quite a few years).

imho I&#039;d like it to be like cars, you know what you&#039;re getting and they just say this is a 99 buick, still a buick and everyone knows that and they know that the 99 one is better then the 1990 model.

so eg nvidia top card 07
but with one of their fancy names to make it sound better :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personally I like the idea of going the way of cpu branding because at least with cpus you know what you&#8217;re getting &#8211; graphics cards are becoming rediculous (or rather, have been for quite a few years).</p>
<p>imho I&#8217;d like it to be like cars, you know what you&#8217;re getting and they just say this is a 99 buick, still a buick and everyone knows that and they know that the 99 one is better then the 1990 model.</p>
<p>so eg nvidia top card 07<br />
but with one of their fancy names to make it sound better :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Based on fillrate, it goes

x1900XTX
x1950XT
x1900XT
x1950 pro
x1900GT

But the x1950 XT has more memory bandwidth than the 1900 XTX thanks to its higher memory clock speed.

Not sure where the 1900 XL fits in.. I think it&#039;s an OEM only part... So it&#039;s probably still using RV3xx architecture ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on fillrate, it goes</p>
<p>x1900XTX<br />
x1950XT<br />
x1900XT<br />
x1950 pro<br />
x1900GT</p>
<p>But the x1950 XT has more memory bandwidth than the 1900 XTX thanks to its higher memory clock speed.</p>
<p>Not sure where the 1900 XL fits in.. I think it&#8217;s an OEM only part&#8230; So it&#8217;s probably still using RV3xx architecture ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rutledge</title>
		<link>http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Rutledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re looking to buy such a fancy card, I would hope you know your ass from your elbow anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re looking to buy such a fancy card, I would hope you know your ass from your elbow anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bird</title>
		<link>http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardcoreware.net/rant-video-card-naming-schemes/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I would say:
x1900XTX
x1950XT
x1900XT
x1950pro
x1900XL
x1900GT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say:<br />
x1900XTX<br />
x1950XT<br />
x1900XT<br />
x1950pro<br />
x1900XL<br />
x1900GT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using xcache
Database Caching 2/17 queries in 0.012 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 283/491 objects using xcache
Content Delivery Network via img.hardcoreware.net

Served from: www.hardcoreware.net @ 2012-02-08 18:58:33 -->
