Ram Specs - Page 4

PC Bliss · 11-02-2003, 06:53 PM

I think its 350 mhz

08-05-2004, 03:31 PM

Unfortunatly like most formula's it isnt perfect.
See mhz cant be directly derived from ns alone. The latency of said mem settings DIRECTLY effects the overall mhz limit. Say 3.3ns mem on some radeon 9800 (non se non pro). Now it can run at same mhz as the 3ns mem and does that at stock settings yet! Why-how? Cause at 3.3ns the non pro bios is more leanient on the cas. Its runs less aggresive timings. Overall mhz can be same with a simple .5 higher cas. My point is while this formulla can give a ruff idea of mhz it means didly for oclocking unless you know two things aswell. A) the mem timings of that chip B) The mem timings of the bios on video card.

firemachine69 · 08-05-2004, 07:59 PM

... Why are you reviving dead threads...

Though I had been looking for this for a bit of time.

Yes, that is true. The formula isn't perfect, latency does play a big part. I found that out with my 8500LE...

firemachine69 · 09-27-2004, 06:31 AM

Thread revival: no no

Secondly, this is for VIDEO CARD RAM not system memory, if you even cared to read the thread.

PC Bliss · 09-27-2004, 10:15 AM

WTF!!!???!!!! I take it someone posted something and then deleted it?

Cuz right now it looks like you are going insane

firemachine69 · 09-27-2004, 11:19 AM

Yep.

Addict · 09-27-2004, 02:11 PM

you shouldnt be able to post, have someone post after that, and be able to delete it so others dont see your stupidity and ignorance

you should have to suffer the humiliation and embarrasement

11-02-2003, 06:53 PM	#31
PC Bliss Truly HARDCORE Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Italy Posts: 7,410	Re: Ram Specs I think its 350 mhz __________________ My PC sucks now, thank god

08-05-2004, 03:31 PM	#32
Xtreme Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Ram Specs Unfortunatly like most formula's it isnt perfect. See mhz cant be directly derived from ns alone. The latency of said mem settings DIRECTLY effects the overall mhz limit. Say 3.3ns mem on some radeon 9800 (non se non pro). Now it can run at same mhz as the 3ns mem and does that at stock settings yet! Why-how? Cause at 3.3ns the non pro bios is more leanient on the cas. Its runs less aggresive timings. Overall mhz can be same with a simple .5 higher cas. My point is while this formulla can give a ruff idea of mhz it means didly for oclocking unless you know two things aswell. A) the mem timings of that chip B) The mem timings of the bios on video card.

08-05-2004, 07:59 PM	#33
firemachine69 hCw~junkie Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 13,839	Re: Ram Specs ... Why are you reviving dead threads... Though I had been looking for this for a bit of time. Yes, that is true. The formula isn't perfect, latency does play a big part. I found that out with my 8500LE... __________________

09-27-2004, 06:31 AM	#34
firemachine69 hCw~junkie Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 13,839	Thread revival: no no Secondly, this is for VIDEO CARD RAM not system memory, if you even cared to read the thread. __________________

09-27-2004, 10:15 AM	#35
PC Bliss Truly HARDCORE Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Italy Posts: 7,410	WTF!!!???!!!! I take it someone posted something and then deleted it? Cuz right now it looks like you are going insane __________________ My PC sucks now, thank god

09-27-2004, 11:19 AM	#36
firemachine69 hCw~junkie Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 13,839	Yep. __________________

09-27-2004, 02:11 PM	#37
Addict Truly HARDCORE Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Louisville, Kentucky Posts: 4,233	you shouldnt be able to post, have someone post after that, and be able to delete it so others dont see your stupidity and ignorance you should have to suffer the humiliation and embarrasement __________________ Lap: 1.86 PM, 6800, 512 ddr2, 80gb hdd, 17"wide, a/b/g integ, bluetooth integ, cd w/r dvd Aquamark 61157 http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=489652493 3DMark05 4444 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=894820 Desk: Athlon Xp, 512 ddr400 pqi turbo, 80gb hdd, radeon 7000,